知名网络小说家去世

① 最近几年去世的著名文学家

1、巴金 2022.10.17
巴金（1904.11.25—2022.10.17），原名李尧棠，另有笔名有佩竿、极乐、黑浪、春风等，字芾甘。汉族，四川成都人，祖籍浙江嘉兴。中国作家、翻译家、社会活动家、无党派爱国民主人士。巴金1904年11月生在四川成都一个封建官僚家庭里，五四运动后，巴金深受新潮思想的影响，并在这种思想的影响下开始了他个人的反封建斗争。1923年巴金离家赴上海、南京等地求学，从此开始了他长达半个世纪的文学创作生涯。
2、季羡林 2022.7.11
季羡林(1911.8.6~2022.7.11)：中国山东省聊城市临清人，字希逋，又字齐奘。国际著名东方学大师、语言学家、文学家、国学家、佛学家、史学家、教育家和社会活动家。历任中国科学院哲学社会科学部委员、聊城大学名誉校长、北京大学副校长、中国社会科学院南亚研究所所长，是北京大学的终身教授。
早年留学国外，通英、德、梵、巴利文，能阅俄、法文，尤精于吐火罗文(当代世界上分布区域最广的语系印欧语系中的一种独立语言)，是世界上仅有的精于此语言的几位学者之一。为“梵学、佛学、吐火罗文研究并举，中国文学、比较文学、文艺理论研究齐飞”，其著作汇编成《季羡林文集》，共24卷。生前曾撰文三辞桂冠：国学大师、学界泰斗、国宝。
3、史铁生 2022.12.31
史铁生（1951年1月4日—2022年12月31日），中国作家、散文家。1951年出生于北京。1967年毕业于清华大学附属中学，1969年去延安一带插队。因双腿瘫痪于1972年回到北京。后来又患肾病并发展到尿毒症，靠着每周3次透析维持生命。后历任中国作家协会全国委员会委员，北京作家协会副主席，中国残疾人联合会副主席。自称职业是生病，业余在写作。2022年12月31日凌晨3时46分因突发脑溢血逝世，享年59岁。
4、莫怀戚 2022.7.27
怀戚，1951年6月3日生于重庆，笔名周平安、章大明。当代作家。中国作家协会会员，重庆作家协会副主席。
1966年初中毕业，到四川内江插队。1982年毕业于四川大学中文系。 生前为重庆师范大学文学与新闻学院新闻系副主任、教授。1980年开始文学创作。其中一篇小说《诗礼人家》曾获“四川文学”奖。著有《莫怀戚中短篇小说选》。其作《散步》被选入苏教版初二语文第二十二课，也被选入了2022年人教版初一上册语文第一课。
4、张贤亮 2022.9.27
张贤亮，男，国家一级作家、收藏家、书法家。1936年生于南京，祖籍江苏盱眙县。代表作：《灵与肉》、《绿化树》、《男人的一半是女人》等，立体文学作品：镇北堡西部影城、老银川一条街。早在50年代初读中学时即开始文学创作，1955年从北京移居宁夏，先当农民后任教员。1957年在“反右运动”中因发表诗歌《大风歌》被划为“右派分子”，押送农场“劳动改造” 长达22年。1979年中共十一届三中全会后平反恢复名誉，重新执笔后创作小说、散文、评论、电影剧本，成为中国当代重要作家之一。曾任宁夏回族自治区文联副主席、主席，中国作家协会宁夏分会主席等职，并任六届政协全国委员会委员，中国作协主席团委员。2022年9月27日，著名作家张贤亮因病医治无效去世，享年78岁。

② 材料作文：一位著名的小说家去世了，在他的文稿中发现了一张未来小说的创作构思提纲……怎么写

1位著名的小说家去世了，在他的文稿中发现了1张未来小说的创作构思提纲，急求1材料作文楼主可以试试写1部科幻小说，在作家的书稿中留下线索，然后引出未来故事。

③ 近几年去世的网文女作家

这个我倒是不知道，但是我挺希望那个脑瘫女作家余秀华早点去世。

④ 最近，好像是几个月前，起点死掉了一个网络小说家，貌似蛮有名的。叫什么来着...

贼道三痴
姓名：郑晖
生卒：1972年1月15日-2022年9月21日5时40分
望采纳

⑤ 有哪些知名网络小说作家离开了起点,去了纵横

烽火戏诸侯，柳下挥，梦入神机，流浪的癞蛤蟆等一批大神级别的作家跟老东家起点，据说是因为起点网站对作家的限制较大，劳资双方因为待遇等原因，致使一大批作家离开起点。简单说，起点的水很深。

⑥ 阅读下面的材料，选择一个角度，写一篇议论文。。一个著名的小说家去世了，在他的文稿中发现了一张未来...

1人与人之间的相处，必须相互包容
2不能改变这个世界，就必须改变自己
3世界人民一家人，尽管我们的文化，信仰各不相同，但我们生活的环境把我们紧紧的联系在一起

⑦ 哪个著名作家过世的时候闹得很大

当古龙死的时候。这直接引发了事件。“如果一个男人的家里没有酒，这个男人是什么？不喝酒的人不是男人！即使他自己不喝，他也应该准备些东西给别人喝！”——从古龙《陆小凤传奇》。

1985年9月21日下午6时，因肝硬化引起食管静脉肿瘤大出血，古龙逝世，享年47岁。倪匡为古龙写了一篇讣告，其中有两句很有名：世上没有古龙，但心中有古龙。然而，我更喜欢乔奇的经典挽联：小李飞刀入声，楚留香不见于世。我喜欢古龙。虽然他擅长饮酒，好色且堕落，但我还是喜欢他，他的才华，他的写作风格，他的不羁的风格和他的可爱。

⑧ 已逝的网络小说作者

贼道三痴，作品《上品寒士》等，大神级，2022年癌症去世

⑨ 哪些年轻网络写手逝世了

某知名阅读网站的A签作者，青鋆，87年生的女孩，浙江金华女孩。
还有一个笔名叫风天啸的男作家也去世了。
纵横中文网签约作者、网络写手这西瓜真大，在老家帮忙时从3楼摔下，医院抢救了几天，还是没救回来。
在起点中文网连载的网络小说《武布天下》作者“十年雪落”猝死在出租屋。

⑩ 马丁·路德·金哪一篇文章中有“一位著名的小说家去世了”这一句

应该不是《我有一个梦想》里的
这是原文http://..com/question/673371.html

是这里的，名字我也不好翻译，看第一句
Where Do We Go from Here Chaos or Community

Martin Luther King, Jr.

I

Some years ago a famous novelist died. Among his papers was found a list of suggested plots for future stories, the most prominently underscored being this one: “A widely separated family inherits a house in which they have to live together.” This is the great new problem of mankind. We have inherited a large house, a great “world house” in which we have to live together—black and white, Easterner and Westerner, Gentile and Jew, Catholic and Protestant, Moslem and Hin—a family unly separated in ideas, culture and interest, who, because we can never again live apart, must learn somehow to live with each other in peace.

However deeply American Negroes are caught in the struggle to be at last at home in our homeland of the United States, we cannot ignore the larger world house in which we are also dwellers. Equality with whites will not solve the problems of either whites or Negroes if it means equality in a world society stricken by poverty and in a universe doomed to extinction by war.

All inhabitants of the globe are now neighbors. This world-wide neighborhood has been brought into being as a result of the modern scientific and technological revolutions. The world of today is vastly different from the world of just one hundred years ago. A century ago Thomas Edison had not yet invented the incandescent lamp to bring light to many dark places of the earth. The Wright brothers had not yet invented that fascinating mechanical bird that would spread its gigantic wings across the skies and soon dwarf distance and place time in the service of man. Einstein had not yet challenged an axiom and the theory of relativity had not yet been posited.

Human beings, searching a century ago as now for better understanding, had no television, no radios, no telephones and no motion pictures through which to communicate. Medical science had not yet discovered the wonder drugs to end many dread plagues and diseases. One hundred years ago military men had not yet developed the terrifying weapons of warfare that we know today—not the bomber, an airborne fortress raining down death; nor napalm, that burner of all things and flesh in its path. A century ago there were no sky-scraping buildings to kiss the stars and no gargantuan bridges to span the waters. Science had not yet peered into the unfathomable ranges of interstellar space, nor had it penetrated oceanic depths. All these new inventions, these new ideas, these sometimes fascinating and sometimes frightening developments, came later. Most of them have come within the past sixty years, sometimes with agonizing slowness, more characteristically with bewildering speed, but always with enormous significance for our future.

The years ahead will see a continuation of the same dramatic developments. Physical science will carve new highways through the stratosphere. In a few years astronauts and cosmonauts will probably walk comfortably across the uncertain pathways of the moon. In two or three years it will be possible, because of the new supersonic jets, to fly from New York to London in two and one-half hours. In the years ahead medical science will greatly prolong the lives of men by finding a cure for cancer and deadly heart ailments. Automation and cybernation will make it possible for working people to have undreamed-of amounts of leisure time. All this is a dazzling picture of the furniture, the workshop, the spacious rooms, the new decorations and the architectural pattern of the large world house in which we are living.

Along with the scientific and technological revolution, we have also witnessed a world-wide freedom revolution over the last few decades. The present upsurge of the Negro people of the United States grows out of a deep and passionate determination to make freedom and equality a reality “here” and “now.” In one sense the civil rights movement in the United States is a special American phenomenon which must be understood in the light of American history and dealt with in terms of the American situation. But on another and more important level, what is happening in the United States today is a significant part of a world development.

We live in a day, said the philosopher Alfred North Whitehead, “when civilization is shifting its basic outlook; a major turning point in history where the pre-suppositions on which society is structured are being analyzed, sharply challenged, and profoundly changed.” What we are seeing now is a freedom explosion, the realization of “an idea whose time has come,” to use Victor Hugo’s phrase. The deep rumbling of discontent that we hear today is the thunder of disinherited masses, rising from ngeons of oppression to the bright hills of freedom. In one majestic chorus the rising masses are singing, in the words of our freedom song, “Ain’t gonna let nobody turn us around.” All over the world like a fever, freedom is spreading in the widest liberation movement in history. The great masses of people are determined to end the exploitation of their races and lands. They are awake and moving toward their goal like a tidal wave. You can hear them rumbling in every village street, on the docks, in the houses, among the students, in the churches and at political meetings. For several centuries the direction of history flowed from the nations and societies of Western Europe out into the rest of the world in “conquests” of various sorts. That period, the era of colonialism, is at an end. East is moving West. The earth is being redistributed. Yes, we are “shifting our basic outlooks.”

These developments should not surprise any student of history. Oppressed people cannot remain oppressed forever. The yearning for freedom eventually manifests itself. The Bible tells the thrilling story of how Moses stood in Pharaoh’s court centuries ago and cried, “Let my people go.” This was an opening chapter in a continuing story. The present struggle in the United States is a later chapter in the same story. Something within has reminded the Negro of his birthright of freedom, and something without has reminded him that it can be gained. Consciously or unconsciously, he has been caught up by the spirit of the times, and with his black brothers of Africa and his brown and yellow brothers in Asia, South America and the Caribbean, the United States Negro is moving with a sense of great urgency toward the promised land of racial justice.

Nothing could be more tragic than for men to live in these revolutionary times and fail to achieve the new attitudes and the new mental outlooks that the new situation demands. In Washington Irving’s familiar story of Rip Van Winkle, the one thing that we usually remember is that Rip slept twenty years. There is another important point, however, that is almost always overlooked. It was the sign on the inn in the little town on the Hudson from which Rip departed and scaled the mountain for his long sleep. When he went up, the sign had a picture of King George III of England. When he came down, twenty years later, the sign had a picture of George Washington. As he looked at the picture of the first President of the United States, Rip was confused, flustered and lost. He knew not who Washington was. The most striking thing about this story is not that Rip slept twenty years, but that he slept through a revolution that would alter the course of human history.

One of the great liabilities of history is that all too many people fail to remain awake through great periods of social change. Every society has its protectors of the status quo and its fraternities of the indifferent who are notorious for sleeping through revolutions. But today our very survival depends on our ability to stay awake, to adjust to new ideas, to remain vigilant and to face the challenge of change. The large house in which we live demands that we transform this world-wide neighborhood into a world-wide brotherhood. Together we must learn to live as brothers or together we will be forced to perish as fools.

We must work passionately and indefatigably to bridge the gulf between our scientific progress and our moral progress. One of the great problems of mankind is that we suffer from a poverty of the spirit which stands in glaring contrast to our scientific and technological abundance. The richer we have become materially, the poorer we have become morally and spiritually.

Every man lives in two realms, the internal and the external. The internal is that realm of spiritual ends expressed in art, literature, morals and religion. The external is that complex of devices, techniques, mechanisms and instrumentalities by means of which we live. Our problem today is that we have allowed the internal to become lost in the external. We have allowed the means by which we live to outdistance the ends for which we live. So much of modern life can be summarized in that suggestive phrase of Thoreau: “Improved means to an unimproved end.” This is the serious predicament, the deep and haunting problem, confronting modern man. Enlarged material powers spell enlarged peril if there is not proportionate growth of the soul. When the external of man’s nature subjugates the internal, dark storm clouds begin to form.

Western civilization is particularly vulnerable at this moment, for our material abundance has brought us neither peace of mind nor serenity of spirit. An Asian writer has portrayed our dilemma in candid terms[1][5]:

You call your thousand material devices “labor-saving machinery,” yet you are forever “busy.” With the multiplying of your machinery you grow increasingly fatigued, anxious, nervous, dissatisfied. Whatever you have, you want more; and wherever you are you want to go somewhere else... your devices are neither time-saving nor soul-saving machinery. They are so many sharp spurs which urge you on to invent more machinery and to do more business.

This tells us something about our civilization that cannot be cast aside as a prejudiced charge by an Eastern thinker who is jealous of Western prosperity. We cannot escape the indictment.

This does not mean that we must turn back the clock of scientific progress. No one can overlook the wonders that science has wrought for our lives. The automobile will not abdicate in favor of the horse and buggy, or the train in favor of the stagecoach, or the tractor in favor of the hand plow, or the scientific method in favor of ignorance and superstition. But our moral and spiritual “lag” must be redeemed. When scientific power outruns moral power, we end up with guided missiles and misguided men. When we foolishly minimize the internal of our lives and maximize the external, we sign the warrant for our own day of doom.

Our hope for creative living in this world house that we have inherited lies in our ability to re-establish the moral ends of our lives in personal character and social justice. Without this spiritual and moral reawakening we shall destroy ourselves in the misuse of our own instruments.

II

Among the moral imperatives of our time, we are challenged to work all over the world with unshakable determination to wipe out the last vestiges of racism. As early as 1906, W.E.B. DuBois prophesied that “the problem of the twentieth century will be the problem of the color line.” Now as we stand two-thirds into this exciting period of history we know full well that racism is still that hound of hell which dogs the tracks of our civilization.

Racism is no mere American phenomenon. Its vicious grasp knows no geographical boundaries. In fact, racism and its perennial ally—economic exploitation—provide the key to understanding most of the international complications of this generation.

The classic example of organized and institutionalized racism is the Union of South Africa. Its national policy and practice are the incarnation of the doctrine of white supremacy in the midst of a population which is overwhelmingly black. But the tragedy of South Africa is not simply in its own policy; it is the fact that the racist government of South Africa is virtually made possible by the economic policies of the United States and Great Britain—two countries which profess to be the moral bastions of our Western world.

In country after country we see white men building empires on the sweat and suffering of colored people. Portugal continues its practices of slave labor and subjugation in Angola; the Ian Smith government in Rhodesia continues to enjoy the support of British-based instry and private capital, despite the stated opposition of British Government policy. Even in the case of the little country of South West Africa, we find the powerful nations of the world incapable of taking a moral position against South Africa, though the smaller country is under the trusteeship of the United Nations. Its policies are controlled by South Africa and its manpower is lured into the mines under slave-labor conditions.

During the Kennedy administration there was some awareness of the problems that breed in the racist and exploitative conditions throughout the colored world, and a temporary concern emerged to free the United States from its complicity, though the effort was only on a diplomatic level. Through our Ambassador to the United Nations, Adlai Stevenson, there emerged the beginnings of an intelligent approach to the colored peoples of the world. However, there remained little or no attempt to deal with the economic aspects of racist exploitation. We have been notoriously silent about the more than $700 million of American capital which props up the system of apartheid, not to mention the billions of dollars in trade and the military alliances which are maintained under the pretext of fighting Communism in Africa.

Nothing provides the Communists with a better climate for expansion and infiltration than the continued alliance of our nation with racism and exploitation throughout the world. And if we are not diligent in our determination to root out the last vestiges of racism in our dealings with the rest of the world, we may soon see the sins of our fathers visited upon ours and succeeding generations. For the conditions which are so classically represented in Africa are present also in Asia and in our own backyard in Latin America.

Everywhere in Latin America one finds a tremendous resentment of the United States, and that resentment is always strongest among the poorer and darker peoples of the continent. The life and destiny of Latin America are in the hands of United States corporations. The decisions affecting the lives of South Americans are ostensibly made by their governments, but there are almost no legitimate democracies alive in the whole continent. The other governments are dominated by huge and exploitative cartels that rob Latin America of her resources while turning over a small rebate to a few members of a corrupt aristocracy, which in turn invests not in its own country, for its own people’s welfare, but in the banks of Switzerland and the playgrounds of the world.

Here we see racism in its more sophisticated form: neo-colonialism. The Bible and the annals of history are replete with tragic stories of one brother robbing another of his birthright and thereby insuring generations of strife and enmity. We can hardly escape such a judgment in Latin America, any more than we have been able to escape the harvest of hate sown in Vietnam by a century of French exploitation.

There is the convenient temptation to attribute the current turmoil and bitterness throughout the world to the presence of a Communist conspiracy to undermine Europe and America, but the potential explosiveness of our world situation is much more attributable to disillusionment with the promises of Christianity and technology.

The revolutionary leaders of Africa, Asia and Latin America have virtually all received their ecation in the capitals of the West. Their earliest training often occurred in Christian missionary schools. Here their sense of dignity was established and they learned that all men were sons of God. In recent years their countries have been invaded by automobiles, Coca-Cola and Hollywood, so that even remote villages have become aware of the wonders and blessings available to God’s white children.

Once the aspirations and appetites of the world have been whetted by the marvels of Western technology and the self-image of a people awakened by religion, one cannot hope to keep people locked out of the earthly kingdom of wealth, health and happiness. Either they share in the blessings of the world or they organize to break down and overthrow those structures or governments which stand in the way of their goals.

Former generations could not conceive of such luxury, but their children now take this vision and demand that it become a reality. And when they look around and see that the only people who do not share in the abundance of Western technology are colored people, it is an almost inescapable conclusion that their condition and their exploitation are somehow related to their color and the racism of the white Western world.

This is a treacherous foundation for a world house. Racism can well be that corrosive evil that will bring down the curtain on Western civilization. Arnold Toynbee has said that some twenty-six civilizations have risen upon the face of the earth. Almost all of them have descended into the junk heaps of destruction. The decline and fall of these civilizations, according to Toynbee, was not caused by external invasions but by internal decay. They failed to respond creatively to the challenges impinging upon them. If Western civilization does not now respond constructively to the challenge to banish racism, some future historian will have to say that a great civilization died because it lacked the soul and commitment to make justice a reality for all men.

Another grave problem that must be solved if we are to live creatively in our world house is that of poverty on an international scale. Like a monstrous octopus, it stretches its choking, prehensile tentacles into lands and villages all over the world. Two-thirds of the peoples of the world go to bed hungry at night. They are undernourished, ill-housed and shabbily clad. Many of them have no houses or beds to sleep in. Their only beds are the sidewalks of the cities and the sty roads of the villages. Most of these poverty-stricken children of God have never seen a physician or a dentist.

There is nothing new about poverty. What is new, however, is that we now have the resources to get rid of it. Not too many years ago, Dr. Kirtley Mather, a Harvard geologist, wrote a book entitled Enough and to Spare.[2][6] He set forth the basic theme that famine is wholly unnecessary in the modern world. Today, therefore, the question on the agenda must read: Why should there be hunger and privation in any land, in any city, at any table, when man has the resources and the scientific know-how to provide all mankind with the basic necessities of life? Even deserts can be irrigated and topsoil can be replaced. We cannot complain of a lack of land, for there are 25 million square miles of tillable land on earth, of which we are using less than seven million. We have amazing knowledge of vitamins, nutrition, the chemistry of food and the versatility of atoms. There is no deficit in human resources; the deficit is in human will.

This does not mean that we can overlook the enormous acceleration in the rate of growth of the world’s population. The population explosion is very real, and it must be faced squarely if we are to avoid, in centuries ahead, a “standing roo